Ian Foster Classical Music Is the Deepest of the Arts and It Goes Deep Beneath the Arts

10 Greatest Poems Ever Written

Updated: September 4, 2021

by Evan Mantyk

What is poetry? What is cracking poesy? The poems below respond these questions. From least greatest (x) to greatest greatest (ane), the poems in this list are limited to ones originally written in the English and which are nether 50 lines, excluding poems like Homer'southward Iliad, Edgar Allan Poe's "Raven," Dante Alighieri's Divine One-act , and Lord Byron's mock ballsy Don Juan . Each poem is followed by some brief assay. Many adept poems and poets had to be left off of this list. In the comments section below, feel costless to make additions or construct your own lists. Y'all can as well submit analyses of archetype poetry to submissions@classicalpoets.org. They volition be considered for publication on this website.

Related Content
10 Greatest Love Poems Ever Written
10 Greatest Sonnets Concerning Other Poets
The Earliest English Poems E'er Written
ten Greatest Novels E'er Written
10 Greatest Poems about Expiry: A Grim Reader

.

ten. "The Route Not Taken" by Robert Frost (1874-1963)

Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And exist one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one equally far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;

Then took the other, equally just as fair,
And having possibly the improve claim,
Considering it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the aforementioned,

And both that morning as lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the starting time for some other twenty-four hours!
Notwithstanding knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come up back.

I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
2 roads diverged in a woods, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.

.

Analysis of the Poem

This verse form deals with that big noble question of "How to make a difference in the earth?" On outset reading, it tells united states that the pick one makes actually does matter, ending: "I took the one less traveled by, / And that has fabricated all the divergence."

A closer reading reveals that the lonely choice that was made earlier by our traveling narrator maybe wasn't all that significant since both roads were pretty much the same anyway ("Had warn them actually near the same") and it is but in the remembering and retelling that it made a difference. We are left to ponder if the narrator had instead traveled down "The Road Not Taken" might information technology have also made a deviation as well. In a sense, "The Route Not Taken" tears apart the traditional view of individualism, which hinges on the importance of choice, as in the instance of democracy in full general (choosing a candidate), equally well every bit various ramble freedoms: option of religion, choice of words (freedom of speech), option of grouping (freedom of assembly), and option of source of information (freedom of press). For example, we might imagine a young man choosing betwixt existence a carpenter or a banker subsequently seeing great significance in his choice to be a banker, but in fact there was not much in his original decision at all other than a passing fancy. In this, we see the universality of human beings: the roads leading to carpenter and banker being basically the aforementioned and the carpenters and bankers at the cease of them—seeming like individuals who made meaning choices—really being just part of the collective of the human race.

Then is this poem not about the question "How to brand a difference in the earth?" after all? No. It is still virtually this question. The ending is the most clear and striking part. If nix else, readers are left with the impression that our narrator, who commands cute verse, profound imagery, and time itself ("ages and ages hence") puts value on striving to make a difference. The striving is reconstituted and complicated here in reflection, but our hero wants to make a difference and and so should we. That is why this is a great verse form, from a basic or shut reading perspective.

.

.

.

9. "The New Colossus" past Emma Lazarus (1849-1887)

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Hither at our bounding main-done, sunset gates shall stand up
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her proper name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows earth-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep, aboriginal lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to exhale free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp abreast the golden door!"

.

Analysis of the Poem

Inscribed on the Statue of Freedom in New York harbor, this sonnet may have the greatest placement of whatsoever English language poem. It besides has one of the greatest placements in history. Lazarus compares the Statue of Liberty to the Colossus of Rhodes, one of the 7 Wonders of the Ancient World. Similar the Statue of Liberty, the Colossus of Rhodes was an enormous god-similar statue positioned in a harbor. Although the Colossus of Rhodes no longer stands, it symbolizes the ancient Greek world and the greatness of the ancient Greek and Roman civilization, which was lost for a thousand years to the West, and simply fully recovered again during the Renaissance. "The New Colossus" succinctly crystallizes the connection between the ancient world and America, a modern nation. It's a connection that tin can be seen in the White House and other state and judicial buildings across America that architecturally mirror ancient Greek and Roman buildings; and in the American political system that mirrors Athenian Democracy and Roman Republicanism.

In the midst of this vast comparison of the ancient and the American, Lazarus yet manages to clearly return America's distinct grapheme. It is the tin can-exercise spirit of taking those persecuted and poor from effectually the world and giving them a new opportunity and hope for the future, what she calls "the aureate door." It is a uniquely scrappy and empathetic quality that sets Americans apart from the ancients. The relevance of this verse form stretches all the fashion back to the pilgrims fleeing religious persecution in Europe to the controversies surrounding modern immigrants from Mexico and the Eye East. While circumstances today have changed drastically, there is no denying that this open door was part of what made America corking one time upon a fourth dimension. It's the perfect depiction of this quintessential Americanness that makes "The New Colossus" also outstanding.

.

.

viii. "Ozymandias" by Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822)

I met a traveler from an antiquarian land
Who said: "Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert . . . Almost them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose pout,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of common cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which all the same survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed:
And on the pedestal these words appear:
'My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!'
Nothing beside remains. Round the disuse
Of that jumbo wreck, dizzying and blank
The lone and level sands stretch far abroad."

.

Assay of the Poem

In this winding story within a story inside a poem, Shelley paints for united states the paradigm of the ruins of a statue of ancient Egyptian male monarch Ozymandias, who is today ordinarily known as Ramesses Ii. This king is still regarded as the greatest and nigh powerful Egyptian pharaoh. Notwithstanding, all that's left of the statue are his legs, which tell us it was huge and impressive; the shattered head and snarling confront, which tell united states how tyrannical he was; and his inscribed quote hailing the magnificent structures that he congenital and that have been reduced to dust, which tells us they might non have been quite as magnificent equally Ozymandias imagined. The epitome of a dictator-like male monarch whose kingdom is no more creates a palpable irony. But, beyond that there is a perennial lesson about the inescapable and destructive forces of time, history, and nature. Success, fame, ability, coin, health, and prosperity can only terminal so long before fading into "alone and level sands."

In that location are all the same more layers of pregnant hither that elevate this into i of the greatest poems. In terms of lost civilizations that show the ephemeralness of human pursuits, there is no improve instance than the Egyptians—who we associate with such dazzling monuments every bit the Sphinx and the Great Pyramid at Giza (that stands far taller than the Statue of Liberty)—yet who completely lost their spectacular language, culture, and culture. If the forces of time, history, and nature can accept down the Egyptian civilization, it begs the question, "Who's next?" Additionally, Ozymandias is believed to have been the villainous pharaoh who enslaved the ancient Hebrews and who Moses led the exodus from. If all ordinary pursuits, such as power and fame, are but dust, what remains, the poem suggests, are spirituality and morality—embodied by the ancient Hebrew religion. If you don't take those then in the long run you are a "colossal wreck." Thus, the perfectly composed scene itself, the Egyptian imagery, and the Biblical backstory convey a perennial bulletin and make this a swell poem.

.

.

vii. "Ode on a Grecian Urn" by John Keats (1795-1821)

K nevertheless unravish'd helpmate of quietness,
Thou foster-kid of silence and slow time,
Sylvan historian, who canst thus express
A flowery tale more sweetly than our rhyme:
What leaf-fring'd fable haunts nearly thy shape
Of deities or mortals, or of both,
In Tempe or the dales of Arcady?
What men or gods are these? What maidens loth?
What mad pursuit? What struggle to escape?
What pipes and timbrels? What wild ecstasy?

Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard
Are sweeter; therefore, ye soft pipes, play on;
Non to the sensual ear, but, more endear'd,
Pipe to the spirit ditties of no tone:
Fair youth, below the trees, thou canst not leave
Thy song, nor e'er tin can those trees be bare;
Bold Lover, never, never canst thou buss,
Though winning near the goal still, do not grieve;
She cannot fade, though thou hast not thy bliss,
For ever wilt thou dearest, and she be fair!

Keats'due south ain drawing of the Grecian Urn.

Ah, happy, happy boughs! that cannot shed
Your leaves, nor e'er bid the Spring goodbye;
And, happy melodist, unwearied,
For e'er piping songs for ever new;
More than happy honey! more happy, happy love!
For ever warm and withal to be enjoy'd,
For e'er panting, and for ever immature;
All animate human passion far above,
That leaves a heart high-sorrowful and disgust'd,
A burning forehead, and a parching natural language.

Who are these coming to the sacrifice?
To what green altar, O mysterious priest,
Lead'st chiliad that heifer lowing at the skies,
And all her silken flanks with garlands drest?
What little town past river or bounding main shore,
Or mountain-congenital with peaceful citadel,
Is emptied of this folk, this pious morning?
And, little boondocks, thy streets for evermore
Volition silent be; and non a soul to tell
Why grand art desolate, tin can e'er render.

O Attic shape! Fair attitude! with brede
Of marble men and maidens overwrought,
With wood branches and the trodden weed;
Thousand, silent class, dost tease us out of thought
As doth eternity: Cold Pastoral!
When onetime historic period shall this generation waste,
Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe
Than ours, a friend to man, to whom thou say'st,
"Dazzler is truth, truth beauty,—that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know."

.

Analysis of the Poem

Equally if in response to Shelley's "Ozymandias," Keats's "Ode on a Grecian Urn" offers a sort of antidote to the inescapable and destructive force of time. Indeed, "Ode on a Grecian Urn" was published in 1819 just a year or and then after "Ozymandias." The antidote is uncomplicated: art. The art on the Grecian urn—which is basically a decorative pot from ancient Greece—has survived for thousands of years. While empires rose and fell, the Grecian urn survived. Musicians, trees, lovers, heifers, and priests all go on dying decade subsequently decade and century after century, but their creative depictions on the Grecian urn live on for what seems eternity.

This realization most the timeless nature of art is not new now nor was it in the 1800s, merely Keats has chosen a perfect instance since aboriginal Greek culture so famously disappeared into the ages, being subsumed by the Romans, and more often than not lost until the Renaissance a thousand years afterwards. Now, the ancient Greeks are all certainly dead (like the king Ozymandias in Shelley's poem) but the Greek art and culture live on through Renaissance painters, the Olympic Games, endemic Neoclassical compages, and, of course, the Grecian urn.

Further, what is depicted on the Grecian urn is a diversity of life that makes the otherwise common cold urn experience alive and vibrant. This aliveness is accentuated by Keats'due south avalanche of questions and blaring exclamations: "More than happy love! more happy, happy love!" Fine art, he seems to suggest, is more alive and real than nosotros might imagine. Indeed, the final two lines tin can be read equally the urn itself talking: "Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all / Ye know on globe, and all ye demand to know." In these profound lines, Keats places u.s. within ignorance, suggesting that what nosotros know on earth is limited, but that artistic beauty, which he has now established is live, is continued with truth. Thus, we can escape ignorance, humanness, and certain expiry and approach another form of life and truth through the beauty of art. This effectively completes the thought that began in Ozymandias and makes this a great poem one notch upwards from its predecessor.

.

.

6. "The Tiger" by William Blake (1757-1827)

Tiger Tiger, called-for bright,
In the forests of the night;
What immortal hand or eye,
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

In what distant deeps or skies.
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the mitt, dare seize the fire?

And what shoulder, and what art,
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to shell,
What dread mitt? and what dread feet?

What the hammer? what the chain,
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? what dread grasp,
Dare its deadly terrors clasp!

When the stars threw down their spears
And water'd sky with their tears:
Did he grinning his piece of work to see?
Did he who fabricated the Lamb make thee?

Tiger Tiger burning bright,
In the forests of the night:
What immortal manus or eye,
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?

.

Assay of the Poem

This verse form contemplates a question arising from the idea of cosmos by an intelligent creator. The question is this: If in that location is a loving, empathetic God or gods who created human beings and whose great powers exceed the comprehension of man beings, as many major religions agree, so why would such a powerful being permit evil into the world. Evil here is represented by a tiger that might, should you be strolling in the Indian or Chinese wild in the 1700s, accept leapt out and killed yous. What would take created such a dangerous and evil creature? How could it possibly be the same divine blacksmith who created a cute harmless fluffy lamb or who created Jesus, also known as the "Lamb of God" (which the devoutly Christian Blake was probably too referring to here). To put it some other way, why would such a divine blacksmith create cute innocent children and then also allow such children to be slaughtered. The bombardment of questions brings this mystery to life with lavish intensity.

Does Blake offer an answer to this question of evil from a good God? Information technology would seem not on the surface. But, this wouldn't be a great poem if information technology were really that open ended. The respond comes in the mode that Blake explains the question. Blake'due south language peels away the mundane earth and offers a look at the super-reality to which poets are privy. Nosotros wing about in "forests of the dark" through "afar deeps or skies" looking for where the fire in the tiger'due south eye was taken from by the Creator. This is the reality of expanded time, infinite, and perception that Blake and then conspicuously elucidates elsewhere with the lines "To encounter a world in a grain of sand / And a heaven in a wild flower, / Hold infinity in the palm of your hand, / And eternity in an hour" ("Auguries of Innocence"). This indirectly tells us that the reality that nosotros ordinarily know and perceive is really insufficient, shallow, and deceptive. Where we perceive the injustice of the wild tiger something else entirely may exist transpiring. What nosotros ordinarily take for truth may really be far from it: a thought that is scary, yet likewise sublime or beautiful—like the cute and fearsome tiger. Thus, this verse form is bully considering it concisely and compellingly presents a question that even so plagues humanity today, as well as a key clue to the respond.

.

.

5. "On His Blindness" past John Milton (1608-1674)

When I consider how my light is spent
Ere half my days in this dark world and wide,
And that 1 talent which is decease to hibernate
Lodg'd with me useless, though my soul more aptitude
To serve therewith my Maker, and present
My true account, lest he returning chide,
"Doth God exact day-labour, light denied?"
I fondly ask. Simply Patience, to prevent
That murmur, soon replies: "God doth non need
Either human being'south piece of work or his ain gifts: who best
Bear his balmy yoke, they serve him best. His state
Is kingly; thousands at his bidding speed
And post o'er land and ocean without residual:
They also serve who but stand and look."

.

Analysis of the Poem

This verse form deals with i's limitations and shortcomings in life. Anybody has them and Milton's incomprehension is a perfect case of this. His eyesight gradually worsened and he became totally bullheaded at the age of 42. This happened subsequently he served in an eminent position under Oliver Cromwell'southward revolutionary Puritan government in England. To put it merely, Milton rose to the highest position an English writer might at the fourth dimension and and then sank all the fashion downwardly to a state of being unable read or write on his own. How pathetic!

The genius of this poem comes in the style that Milton transcends the misery he feels. First, he frames himself, not as an individual suffering or lonely, simply equally a failed servant to the Creator: God. While Milton is disabled, God here is enabled through imagery of a male monarch commanding thousands. This celestial monarch, his ministers and troops, and his kingdom itself are invisible to human optics anyway, so already Milton has subtly undone much of his failing by subverting the necessity for human being vision. More than straightforwardly, through the vox of Patience, Milton explains that serving the celestial monarch only requires bearing those hardships, which actually aren't that bad (he calls them "mild") that life has burdened you lot with (like a "yoke" put on an ox). This grand mission from sky may be as elementary as standing and waiting, having patience, and understanding the order of the universe. Thus, this is a dandy poem because Milton has not only dispelled sadness over a major shortcoming in life but also shown how the shortcoming is itself imbued with an extraordinary and uplifting purpose.

.

.

4. "A Psalm of Life" past Henry Wadsworth Longfellow (1807-1882)

What the centre of the young man said to the Psalmist

Tell me non, in mournful numbers,
Life is just an empty dream!
For the soul is expressionless that slumbers,
And things are not what they seem.

Life is real! Life is earnest!
And the grave is not its goal;
Dust thou art, to dust returnest,
Was non spoken of the soul.

Not enjoyment, and not sorrow,
Is our destined finish or fashion;
But to act, that each tomorrow
Find united states of america farther than today.

Fine art is long, and Time is fleeting,
And our hearts, though stout and dauntless,
Still, similar muffled drums, are beating
Funeral marches to the grave.

In the world's broad field of battle,
In the bivouac of Life,
Be not like dumb, driven cattle!
Exist a hero in the strife!

Trust no Futurity, howe'er pleasant!
Let the dead By coffin its expressionless!
Act,—act in the living Present!
Heart within, and God o'erhead!

Lives of swell men all remind u.s.a.
We tin can make our lives sublime,
And, parting, leave behind usa
Footprints on the sands of time;—

Footprints, that maybe another,
Sailing o'er life's solemn main,
A forlorn and shipwrecked brother,
Seeing, shall take heart over again.

Permit united states of america, then, exist up and doing,
With a heart for any fate;
Still achieving, notwithstanding pursuing,
Larn to labor and to wait.

Analysis of the Poem

In this nine-stanza poem, the get-go half dozen stanzas are rather vague since each stanza seems to begin a new idea. Instead, the emphasis hither is on a feeling rather than a rational train of thought. What feeling? It seems to exist a reaction against science, which is focused on calculations ("mournful numbers") and empirical evidence, of which in that location is no, or very little, to show the existence of the soul. Longfellow lived when the Industrial Revolution was in loftier gear and the ideals of scientific discipline, rationality, and reason flourished. From this perspective, the fact that the outset six stanzas do not follow a rational train of thought makes perfect sense.

According to the poem, the strength of science seems to restrain 1's spirit or soul ("for the soul is expressionless that slumbers"), lead to inaction and complacency from which we must break free ("Human action,—act in the living Present! / Eye within, and God o'erhead!") for lofty purposes such as Art, Eye, and God before time runs out ("Fine art is long, and Time is fleeting"). The final three stanzas—which, having broken gratis from scientific discipline by this indicate in the poem, read more smoothly—advise that this acting for lofty purposes tin pb to greatness and can help our fellow man.

Nosotros might think of the entire verse form as a blaring call to exercise cracking things, all the same insignificant they may seem in the present and on the empirically observable surface. That may mean writing a poem and entering it into a verse contest, when you lot know the chances of your poem winning are very small-scale; risking your life for something you believe in when you know it is not popular or information technology is misunderstood; or volunteering for a crusade that, although it may seem hopeless, you experience is truly important. Thus, the greatness of this poem lies in its ability to and so conspicuously prescribe a method for greatness in our modernistic earth.

.

.

3. "Daffodils" past William Wordsworth (1770-1850)

I wandered lonely every bit a cloud
That floats on loftier o'er vales and hills,
When all at once I saw a oversupply,
A host, of aureate daffodils;
Abreast the lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.

Continuous as the stars that smoothen
And twinkle on the milky way,
They stretched in never-ending line
Along the margin of a bay:
10 m saw I at a glance,
Tossing their heads in sprightly dance.

The waves beside them danced; but they
Out-did the sparkling waves in glee:
A poet could not simply exist gay,
In such a jocund company:
I gazed—and gazed—only petty thought
What wealth the show to me had brought:

For frequently, when on my burrow I lie
In vacant or in pensive mood,
They flash upon that inward eye
Which is the bliss of solitude;
And then my center with pleasure fills,
And dances with the daffodils.

.

Analysis of the Poem

Through the narrator's chance see with a field of daffodils by the water, nosotros are presented with the power and beauty of the natural world. It sounds uncomplicated enough, but there are several factors that contribute to this poem's greatness. Start, the verse form comes at a time when the Western world is industrializing and homo feels spiritually lonely in the face up of an increasingly godless worldview. This feeling is perfectly harnessed past the depiction of wandering through the wilderness "lone every bit a cloud" and past the ending scene of the narrator sadly lying on his couch "in vacant or in pensive mood" and finding happiness in confinement. The daffodils and then get more than than nature; they become a companion and a source of personal joy. Second, the very simplicity itself of enjoying nature—flowers, trees, the body of water, the sky, the mountains etc.—is perfectly manifested by the simplicity of the verse form: the 4 stanzas simply begin with daffodils, describe daffodils, compare daffodils to something else, and end on daffodils, respectively. Any mutual reader can easily get this poem, every bit easily as her or she might enjoy a walk around a lake.

3rd, Wordsworth has subtly put forward more than just an ode to nature hither. Every stanza mentions dancing and the tertiary stanza even calls the daffodils "a testify." At this time in England, one might have paid money to run into an opera or other functioning of high artistic quality. Here, Wordsworth is putting forward the idea that nature can offer like joys and even give you "wealth" instead of taking it from y'all, undoing the idea that beauty is attached to earthly money and social status. This, coupled with the language and topic of the poem, which are both relatively accessible to the common man, brand for a peachy poem that demonstrates the extensive and accessible nature of beauty and its associates, truth and bliss.

.

.

two. "Holy Sonnet 10: Death, Be Not Proud" past John Donne (1572-1631)

Death, be not proud, though some have called thee
Mighty and dreadful, for one thousand art not so;
For those whom thou think'st thou dost overthrow
Die not, poor Expiry, nor yet canst thou kill me.
From rest and slumber, which merely thy pictures be,
Much pleasure; then from thee much more must flow,
And soonest our best men with thee practise become,
Residuum of their basic, and soul'southward delivery.
Chiliad art slave to fate, take chances, kings, and desperate men,
And dost with poison, war, and sickness dwell,
And poppy or charms tin can make us sleep as well
And better than thy stroke; why corking'st thou then?
Ane brusque sleep by, we wake eternally
And decease shall exist no more; Death, thou shalt die.

.

Analysis of the Poem

Death is a perennial subject of fear and despair. Merely, this sonnet seems to say that it need not be this way. The highly focused attack on Death's sense of pride uses a grocery list of rhetorical attacks: First, sleep, which is the closest human experience to decease, is actually quite nice. Second, all great people dice sooner or afterwards and the process of decease could be viewed as joining them. 3rd, Death is under the control of higher authorities such as fate, which controls accidents, and kings, who wage wars; from this perspective, Expiry seems no more than than a pawn in a larger chess game within the universe. Fourth, Death must associate with some unsavory characters: "poison, wars, and sickness." Yikes! They must make unpleasant coworkers! (You can virtually come across Donne laughing equally he wrote this.) Fifth, "poppy and charms" (drugs) can do the sleep job also equally Death or better. Expiry, y'all're fired!

The sixth, nigh compelling, and about serious reason is that if one truly believes in a soul and so Expiry is really null to worry virtually. The soul lives eternally and this explains line 4, when Donne says that Decease can't impale him. If you recognize the subordinate position of the trunk in the universe and place more fully with your soul, then you can't exist killed in an ordinary sense. Further, this poem is so not bad because of its universal awarding. Fear of death is so natural an instinct and Death itself so all-encompassing and inescapable for people, that the spirit of this verse form and applicability of information technology extends to nearly whatever fear or weakness of grapheme that one might have. Confronting, head on, such a fear or weakness, as Donne has washed here, allows homo beings to transcend their condition and their perception of Death, more than fully perhaps than 1 might through art by itself—as many poets from this top x list seem to say—since the art may or may not survive may or may not be any skillful, simply the intrinsic quality of one's soul lives eternally. Thus, Donne leaves a powerful lesson to learn from: face up what you lot fright head on and remember that there is nothing to fear on earth if you lot believe in a soul.

.

.

one. "Sonnet 18" by William Shakespeare (1564-1616)

Shall I compare thee to a summer'south day?
Yard fine art more lovely and more temperate:
Crude winds do milk shake the darling buds of May,
And summer'south charter hath all too short a date:
Sometime too hot the eye of sky shines,
And ofttimes is his gold complexion dimm'd;
And every fair from fair sometime declines,
By risk, or nature'southward irresolute class, untrimm'd;
But thy eternal summer shall not fade
Nor lose possession of that fair thou ow'st;
Nor shall Death brag thou wander'st in his shade,
When in eternal lines to time thou grow'st;
So long as men tin can exhale or optics tin see,
And then long lives this, and this gives life to thee.

.

Analysis of the Verse form

Basically, the narrator tells someone he esteems highly that this person is amend than a summertime's day because a summer's day is often too hot and too windy, and specially because a summer'south day doesn't concluding; information technology must fade abroad only as people, plants, and animals die. Just, this esteemed person does non lose beauty or fade abroad like a summer's day because he or she is eternally preserved in the narrator'due south own poetry. "So long lives this, and this gives life to thee" ways "This verse lives long, and this poetry gives life to y'all."

From a modern perspective this verse form might come off every bit pompous (assuming the greatness of i's own verse), capricious (criticizing a summer's day upon what seems a whim), and sycophantic (praising someone without substantial evidence). How then could this possibly exist number ane? Subsequently the bad taste of an sometime flavour to a modern tongue wears off, we realize that this is the very all-time of poesy. This is not pompous because Shakespeare actually achieves greatness and creates an eternal poem. It is okay to recognize poetry as great if it is great and it is okay to recognize an artistic hierarchy. In fact, it is absolutely necessary in educating, guiding, and leading others. The attack on a summer'south solar day is not arbitrary. Woven throughout the language is an implicit connection between human beings, the natural world ("a summer's day"), and heaven (the sun is "the heart of heaven"). A comparing of a human to a summer'southward day immediately opens the mind to unconventional possibilities; to spiritual perspectives; to the ethereal realm of poetry and dazzler. The unabashed praise for someone without a hint as to fifty-fifty the gender or accomplishments of the person is not irrational or sycophantic. It is a pure and simple way of approaching our relationships with other people, assuming the all-time. It is a happier way to live—immediately complimentary from the depression, stress, and cynicism that creeps into our hearts. Thus, this verse form is strikingly and refreshingly bold, profound, and uplifting.

Finally, as to the question of overcoming death, fear, and the decay of time, an overarching question in these great poems, Shakespeare adroitly answers them all by skipping the question, suggesting information technology is of no result. He wields such sublime power that he is unmoved and can instead offer remedy, his verse, at will to those he sees conforming. How marvelous!

.

.

---

Note TO READERS: If you enjoyed this poem or other content, please consider making a donation to the Society of Classical Poets.

NOTE TO POETS: The Society considers this page, where your poetry resides, to be your residence as well, where y'all may invite family, friends, and others to visit. Feel gratis to care for this page as your domicile and remove anyone here who disrespects you. Simply send an email to mbryant@classicalpoets.org. Put "Remove Comment" in the subject line and list which comments you would like removed. The Society does non endorse any views expressed in private poems or comments and reserves the right to remove whatsoever comments to maintain the decorum of this website and the integrity of the Society. Please see our Comments Policy here.

CODEC News:

bellentwere.blogspot.com

Source: https://classicalpoets.org/2016/01/07/10-greatest-poems-ever-written/

Share this post